Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 3090 outperforms Radeon 680M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 3090 is 854 days older than Radeon 680M.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090
- Performs up to 232% better in Immortals of Aveum than Radeon 680M - 63 vs 19 FPS
Advantages of AMD Radeon 680M
- Consumes up to 86% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 - 50 vs 350 Watts
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2020
FPS
63
100%
Value, €/FPS
€10.82/FPS
100%
Price, €
€681.76
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €681.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54938 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2020
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
556 GTexel/s
100%
Integrated • Jan 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
70.4 GPixel/s
37.09167544783983%
Texel Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
18.992805755395683%
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 | vs | AMD Radeon 680M |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2023 |
GeForce 30 | Generation | Navi II IGP |
$1499 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
1x 12-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Integrated |
24 GB | Memory | System-Shared |
GDDR6X | Type | System-Shared |
384-bit | Bus | System-Shared |
936.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | System-Shared |
1395 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |
1695 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2200 MHz |
1219 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | System-Shared |