Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Arc A750 outperforms the more expensive GeForce GTX 960 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Arc A750 is 2820 days newer than the more expensive GeForce GTX 960.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than Intel Arc A750 - 120 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of Intel Arc A750
- Performs up to 2650% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than GeForce GTX 960 - 55 vs 2 FPS
- Up to 27% cheaper than GeForce GTX 960 - $169.32 vs $233.25
- Up to 97% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than GeForce GTX 960 - $3.42 vs $129.46 per FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 - 8 vs 2 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Buy for €258.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
55
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€187.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €187.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 130 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 22nd, 2015
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 22nd, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
37.7 GPixel/s
14%
Texel Fillrate
75.39 GTexel/s
14%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 | vs | Intel Arc A750 |
---|---|---|
Jan 22nd, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
GeForce 900 | Generation | Alchemist |
$199 | MSRP | $289 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
112.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1127 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2050 MHz |
1178 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2400 MHz |
1753 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |