Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms GeForce GTX 750 GM206 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 295X2 is 567 days older than GeForce GTX 750 GM206.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 295X2 - 60 vs 500 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 295X2
- Performs up to 81% better in Control than GeForce GTX 750 GM206 - 47 vs 26 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206 - 4 vs 2 GB
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
GeForce GTX 750 GM206
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2015
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 750 GM206
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
39.65 GPixel/s
60%
Texel Fillrate
39.65 GTexel/s
22%
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2014 |
| GeForce 700 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1499 |
| 2x DVI, 1x HDMI | Outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 3x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
| 80.19 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
1087 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1018 MHz |
| 1239 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1253 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
