Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms GeForce GTX 680M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 295X2 is 694 days newer than GeForce GTX 680M.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 295X2 - 100 vs 500 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 295X2
- Performs up to 18% better in Ready or Not than GeForce GTX 680M - 107 vs 91 FPS
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
GeForce GTX 680M
Mobile • Jun 4th, 2012
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 680M
Mobile • Jun 4th, 2012
Pixel Fillrate
21.22 GPixel/s
32%
Texel Fillrate
84.9 GTexel/s
47%
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680M | vs | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 4th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2014 |
| GeForce 600M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1499 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 3x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
| 115.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
| 719 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1018 MHz |
| 758 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
