Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms GeForce GTX 660 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 1085 days newer than GeForce GTX 660.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660
- Consumes up to 20% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 140 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 24% better in Grand Theft Auto V than GeForce GTX 660 - 94 vs 76 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 - 4 vs 2 GB
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GTX 660
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2012
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 660
Desktop • Sep 6th, 2012
Pixel Fillrate
20.64 GPixel/s
32%
Texel Fillrate
82.56 GTexel/s
32%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| GeForce 600 | Generation | Pirate Islands |
$229 | MSRP | $649 |
| 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| 1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | HBM |
| 192-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
| 144.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| 980 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 1032 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1502 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
