Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Arc A310 outperforms the more expensive GeForce GTX 650 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Arc A310 is 3241 days newer than the more expensive GeForce GTX 650.
Advantages of Intel Arc A310
- Performs up to 71% better in Fortnite than GeForce GTX 650 - 53 vs 31 FPS
- Up to 42% cheaper than GeForce GTX 650 - $73.11 vs $125.67
- Up to 66% better value when playing Fortnite than GeForce GTX 650 - $1.53 vs $4.5 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 - 30 vs 65 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 - 4 vs 1 GB
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €139.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 153 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
53
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.15
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €81.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 152 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 27th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Nov 27th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
8.464 GPixel/s
30%
Texel Fillrate
33.86 GTexel/s
60%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 | vs | Intel Arc A310 |
---|---|---|
Nov 27th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
GeForce 600 | Generation | Alchemist |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
80 GB/s | Bandwidth | 124 GB/s |
1058 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1937 MHz |