Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile outperforms Radeon R9 280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 1876 days newer than Radeon R9 280.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
- Performs up to 36% better in Death Stranding than Radeon R9 280 - 99 vs 73 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 6 vs 3 GB
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
76.32 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
152.6 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
192-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
1455 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
1590 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |