Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile outperforms Radeon Pro WX 3200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile is 70 days older than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
- Performs up to 20% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 71 vs 59 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 6 vs 4 GB
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
59
83%
Value, €/FPS
€1.58/FPS
100%
Price, €
€93.32
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €93.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
76.32 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
152.6 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
27%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
27%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $199 |
None | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
192-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
1455 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1295 MHz |
1590 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |