Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q outperforms Radeon HD 7950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q is 2639 days newer than Radeon HD 7950.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
- Performs up to 1500% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Radeon HD 7950 - 16 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon HD 7950 - 6 vs 3 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2019
Radeon HD 7950
Desktop • Jan 31st, 2012
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
64.08 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
128.2 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Max-Q | vs | AMD Radeon HD 7950 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 31st, 2012 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Southern Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $449 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 192-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
1140 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 800 MHz |
| 1335 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
