Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms the cheaper Arc A310 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Arc A310 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 1268 days older than the cheaper Arc A310.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 7% better in Cities: Skylines II than Arc A310 - 16 vs 15 FPS
Advantages of Intel Arc A310
- Up to 33% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1650 - $73.11 vs $109.68
- Up to 29% better value when playing Cities: Skylines II than GeForce GTX 1650 - $5.41 vs $7.61 per FPS
- Consumes up to 60% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 30 vs 75 Watts
Cities: Skylines II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
16
100%
Value, €/FPS
€7.61/FPS
71%
Price, €
€121.74
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for €121.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
Buy for €81.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | vs | Intel Arc A310 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Alchemist |
$149 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
128.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 124 GB/s |
1485 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
1665 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |
2001 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1937 MHz |