Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX Vega 64 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GTX 1650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon RX Vega 64 is 624 days older than the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Up to 68% cheaper than Radeon RX Vega 64 - $117.58 vs $364.86
- Up to 61% better value when playing Crysis 3 Remastered than Radeon RX Vega 64 - $1.65 vs $4.18 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 - 75 vs 295 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX Vega 64
- Performs up to 23% better in Crysis 3 Remastered than GeForce GTX 1650 - 97 vs 79 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 8 vs 4 GB
Crysis 3 Remastered
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
79
81%
Value, €/FPS
€1.65/FPS
100%
Price, €
€130.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €130.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
Buy for €405 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Aug 7th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
53%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
23%
Desktop • Aug 7th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
98.94 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
395.8 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | vs | AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 7th, 2017 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Vega |
$149 | MSRP | $499 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 2x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | HBM2 |
128-bit | Bus | 2048-bit |
128.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 483.8 GB/s |
1485 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1247 MHz |
1665 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1546 MHz |
2001 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 945 MHz |