Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX 6950 XT outperforms the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GTX 1650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon RX 6950 XT is 1113 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Up to 78% cheaper than Radeon RX 6950 XT - $113.32 vs $523.5
- Up to 49% better value when playing Elden Ring than Radeon RX 6950 XT - $2.47 vs $4.8 per FPS
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT - 75 vs 335 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT
- Performs up to 137% better in Elden Ring than GeForce GTX 1650 - 121 vs 51 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 16 vs 4 GB
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
51
42%
Value, €/FPS
€2.47/FPS
100%
Price, €
€125.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €125.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16764 minutes ago
Desktop • May 10th, 2022
FPS
121
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.8/FPS
51%
Price, €
€581.08
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for €581.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16764 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • May 10th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
18%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
12%
Desktop • May 10th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
295.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
739.2 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | vs | AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | May 10th, 2022 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Navi II |
$149 | MSRP | $1099 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | 2x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
128.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 576 GB/s |
1485 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1860 MHz |
1665 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2310 MHz |
2001 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |