Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX 6900 XT outperforms the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GTX 1650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon RX 6900 XT is 554 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Up to 83% cheaper than Radeon RX 6900 XT - $113.32 vs $682.17
- Up to 71% better value when playing Forza Horizon 4 than Radeon RX 6900 XT - $0.73 vs $2.52 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT - 75 vs 300 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT
- Performs up to 74% better in Forza Horizon 4 than GeForce GTX 1650 - 301 vs 173 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 16 vs 4 GB
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
173
57%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€125.79
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €125.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18171 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2020
FPS
301
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.52/FPS
28%
Price, €
€757.21
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €757.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18171 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2020
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
18%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
12%
Desktop • Oct 28th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
288 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
720 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | vs | AMD Radeon RX 6900 XT |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 28th, 2020 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Navi II |
$149 | MSRP | $999 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C |
None | Power Connectors | 2x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
128.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1485 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1825 MHz |
1665 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |
2001 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |