Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms the more expensive Radeon Pro W6400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 1002 days older than the more expensive Radeon Pro W6400.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Up to 38% cheaper than Radeon Pro W6400 - $109.68 vs $178.04
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6400
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 50 vs 75 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €121.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73865 minutes ago
Buy for €197.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73864 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
71.43048666041024%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
83.32439678284182%
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro W6400 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$149 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
128.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
1485 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
1665 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
2001 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |