Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile outperforms Radeon R9 270 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is 2353 days newer than Radeon R9 270.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
- Performs up to 16% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Radeon R9 270 - 58 vs 50 FPS
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 270 - 50 vs 150 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 270 - 4 vs 2 GB
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2020
Desktop • Nov 13th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Apr 23rd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
47.52 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
95.04 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon R9 270 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 13th, 2013 |
GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $179 |
None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
1350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
1485 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |