Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q outperforms Radeon R9 285 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 2039 days newer than Radeon R9 285.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
- Performs up to 6% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Radeon R9 285 - 37 vs 35 FPS
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 285 - 50 vs 190 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 285 - 4 vs 2 GB
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Radeon R9 285
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 2nd, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
38.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
76.8 GTexel/s
74%
Radeon R9 285
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.38 GPixel/s
76%
Texel Fillrate
102.8 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q | vs | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $249 |
| None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
| 160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 176 GB/s |
1035 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 918 MHz |
| 1200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1375 MHz |
