Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 390X outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 390X is 1763 days older than GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 390X - 50 vs 275 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 390X
- Performs up to 4% better in Dota 2 than GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile - 171 vs 165 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile - 8 vs 4 GB
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Radeon R9 390X
Desktop • Jun 18th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
48.48 GPixel/s
72%
Texel Fillrate
96.96 GTexel/s
52%
Radeon R9 390X
Desktop • Jun 18th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
67.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
184.8 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon R9 390X |
|---|---|---|
Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 18th, 2015 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $429 |
| None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
| 192 GB/s | Bandwidth | 384 GB/s |
1380 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1050 MHz |
| 1515 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
