Key Differences
In short — Arc A580 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Arc A580 is 1273 days newer than GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
- Consumes up to 83% less energy than Intel Arc A580 - 30 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of Intel Arc A580
- Performs up to 45% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q - 461 vs 319 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q - 8 vs 4 GB
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Arc A580
Desktop • Oct 10th, 2023
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
36 GPixel/s
18%
Texel Fillrate
72 GTexel/s
18%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | vs | Intel Arc A580 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 10th, 2023 |
| GeForce 16 Mobile | Generation | Alchemist |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| None | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |
| None | Power Connectors | 2x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
| 160 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| 930 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1700 MHz |
| 1125 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |
| 1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |
