Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 265 outperforms GeForce GTS 450 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 265 is 1249 days newer than GeForce GTS 450.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 265 - 106 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 265
- Performs up to 15% better in World of Tanks than GeForce GTS 450 - 116 vs 101 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 - 2 vs 1 GB
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 13th, 2010
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Sep 13th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
6.264 GPixel/s
21%
Texel Fillrate
25.06 GTexel/s
42%
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
59.2 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 265 |
---|---|---|
Sep 13th, 2010 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2014 |
GeForce 400 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
$129 | MSRP | $149 |
2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
57.73 GB/s | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
783 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
902 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |