Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280 outperforms GeForce GT 650M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280 is 712 days newer than GeForce GT 650M.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 45 vs 200 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280
- Performs up to 26% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than GeForce GT 650M - 43 vs 34 FPS
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M - 3 vs 1 GB
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Mar 22nd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
---|---|---|
Mar 22nd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
GeForce 600M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
28.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
835 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
950 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |