Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms GeForce GT 435M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 1685 days newer than GeForce GT 435M.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 35 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 24% better in Dota 2 than GeForce GT 435M - 174 vs 140 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M - 4 vs 1 GB
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
GeForce GT 435M
Mobile • Jan 15th, 2011
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
NVIDIA GeForce GT 435M | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 15th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| GeForce 400M | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
| None | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| DDR3 | Type | HBM |
| 128-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
| 25.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| 590 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
800 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
