Key Differences
In short — Arc A380 outperforms GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Arc A380 is 4522 days newer than GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than Intel Arc A380 - 58 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of Intel Arc A380
- Performs up to 70% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than GeForce GT 220 - 56 vs 33 FPS
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 6 vs 1 GB
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
GeForce GT 220
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Arc A380
Desktop • Jun 14th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GT 220
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
7.3170731707317085%
Texel Fillrate
14.4 GTexel/s
10.975609756097562%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | Intel Arc A380 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Jun 14th, 2022 |
| GeForce 200 | Generation | Alchemist |
| Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 6 GB |
| GDDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 96-bit |
| 22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 186 GB/s |
| 600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2050 MHz |
| 700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1937 MHz |
