Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 260X outperforms GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 260X is 1351 days newer than GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 260X - 58 vs 115 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 260X
- Performs up to 3% better in F1 23 than GeForce GT 220 - 166 vs 161 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 2 vs 1 GB
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
FPS
166
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.98/FPS
100%
Price, €
€162.32
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €162.32 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36736 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
27.27272727272727%
Texel Fillrate
14.4 GTexel/s
23.376623376623375%
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
17.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
61.6 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 260X |
---|---|---|
Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $139 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 104 GB/s |
600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1100 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1625 MHz |