Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro WX 3200 outperforms GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro WX 3200 is 3444 days newer than GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 - 58 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200
- Performs up to 19% better in Elden Ring than GeForce GT 220 - 38 vs 32 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 4 vs 1 GB
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
FPS
38
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.99/FPS
100%
Price, €
€113.62
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €113.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36042 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
23.166023166023166%
Texel Fillrate
14.4 GTexel/s
34.74903474903475%
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
20.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
41.44 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 |
---|---|---|
Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2019 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | $199 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1295 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |