Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6400 outperforms GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro W6400 is 4376 days newer than GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro W6400
- Performs up to 800% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than GeForce GT 220 - 9 vs 1 FPS
- Consumes up to 14% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 50 vs 58 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 4 vs 1 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
FPS
9
100%
Value, €/FPS
€21.96/FPS
100%
Price, €
€197.62
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €197.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55193 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Pixel Fillrate
4.8 GPixel/s
6.435178978415336%
Texel Fillrate
14.4 GTexel/s
12.868632707774799%
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro W6400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
GeForce 200 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
22.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
600 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
700 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |