Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280 outperforms GeForce 930MX on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280 is 728 days older than GeForce 930MX.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 930MX
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 17 vs 200 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280
- Performs up to 9% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than GeForce 930MX - 62 vs 57 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 930MX - 3 vs 2 GB
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2016
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
104.5 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce 930MX | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2016 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
GeForce 900M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
952 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
1020 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |