Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 265 outperforms GeForce 920M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 265 is 393 days older than GeForce 920M.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 920M
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 265 - 33 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 265
- Performs up to 13% better in Resident Evil 4 than GeForce 920M - 52 vs 46 FPS
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
GeForce 920M
Mobile • Mar 13th, 2015
Radeon R7 265
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
GeForce 920M
Mobile • Mar 13th, 2015
Pixel Fillrate
7.632 GPixel/s
25.783783783783782%
Texel Fillrate
30.53 GTexel/s
51.570945945945944%
Radeon R7 265
Desktop • Feb 13th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
59.2 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce 920M | vs | AMD Radeon R7 265 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 13th, 2015 | Release Date | Feb 13th, 2014 |
| GeForce 900M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
| None | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
954 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
| 900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |
