Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms GeForce 820M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 295X2 is 326 days older than GeForce 820M.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce 820M
- Consumes up to 91% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 295X2 - 45 vs 500 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 295X2
- Performs up to 10% better in Counter-Strike 2 than GeForce 820M - 354 vs 321 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 820M - 4 vs 2 GB
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
GeForce 820M
Mobile • Mar 21st, 2015
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R9 295X2
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
100%
NVIDIA GeForce 820M | vs | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 21st, 2015 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2014 |
| GeForce 800M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1499 |
| None | Outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 3x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Bus | 512-bit |
| 28.83 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
| 810 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1018 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| 901 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
