Key Differences
In short — Radeon R7 250E outperforms UHD Graphics 615 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R7 250E is 1783 days older than UHD Graphics 615.
Advantages of Intel UHD Graphics 615
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than AMD Radeon R7 250E - 15 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 250E
- Performs up to 25% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than UHD Graphics 615 - 10 vs 8 FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
UHD Graphics 615
Integrated • Nov 7th, 2018
Radeon R7 250E
Desktop • Dec 20th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
UHD Graphics 615
Integrated • Nov 7th, 2018
Pixel Fillrate
2.7 GPixel/s
21%
Texel Fillrate
21.6 GTexel/s
84%
Radeon R7 250E
Desktop • Dec 20th, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
12.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
25.6 GTexel/s
100%
Intel UHD Graphics 615 | vs | AMD Radeon R7 250E |
|---|---|---|
Nov 7th, 2018 | Release Date | Dec 20th, 2013 |
| HD Graphics-T | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $109 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 1 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 128-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 72 GB/s |
| 300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 800 MHz |
| 900 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1125 MHz |
