Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms Iris Graphics 6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 295X2 is 129 days older than Iris Graphics 6100.
Advantages of Intel Iris Graphics 6100
- Consumes up to 97% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 295X2 - 15 vs 500 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 295X2
- Performs up to 160% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Iris Graphics 6100 - 26 vs 10 FPS
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Integrated • Sep 5th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Iris Graphics 6100 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
---|---|---|
Sep 5th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2014 |
HD Graphics-M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $1499 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 3x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 4 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
System-Shared | Bus | 512-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1018 MHz |
1000 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |