Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280X outperforms HD Graphics 610 Mobile on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280X is 1057 days older than HD Graphics 610 Mobile.
Advantages of Intel HD Graphics 610 Mobile
- Consumes up to 98% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280X - 5 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280X
- Performs up to 32% better in Deathloop than HD Graphics 610 Mobile - 54 vs 41 FPS
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Integrated • Aug 30th, 2016
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Aug 30th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
1.8 GPixel/s
5%
Texel Fillrate
10.8 GTexel/s
8%
Intel HD Graphics 610 Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
---|---|---|
Aug 30th, 2016 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
HD Graphics-M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $299 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 3 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
System-Shared | Bus | 384-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 850 MHz |
900 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |