Key Differences
In short — Arc A750 outperforms GeForce GT 220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Arc A750 is 4642 days newer than GeForce GT 220.
Advantages of Intel Arc A750
- Performs up to 633% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than GeForce GT 220 - 66 vs 9 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 - 8 vs 1 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 220
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than Intel Arc A750 - 58 vs 225 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
FPS
66
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.85/FPS
100%
Price, €
€187.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €187.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 26th, 2010
Theoretical Performance
Intel Arc A750 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GT 220 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 26th, 2010 |
Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 200 |
$289 | MSRP | Not Available |
1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR3 |
256-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 22.4 GB/s |
2050 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 600 MHz |
2400 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
2000 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 700 MHz |