Key Differences
In short — Arc A750 outperforms the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon Pro WX 3100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Arc A750 is 1948 days newer than the cheaper Radeon Pro WX 3100.
Advantages of Intel Arc A750
- Performs up to 63% better in Rust than Radeon Pro WX 3100 - 142 vs 87 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 - 8 vs 4 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100
- Up to 40% cheaper than Arc A750 - $102.33 vs $169.32
- Up to 1% better value when playing Rust than Arc A750 - $1.31 vs $1.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than Intel Arc A750 - 65 vs 225 Watts
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €187.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 70 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
FPS
87
61%
Value, €/FPS
€1.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€113.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €113.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 72 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 12th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
7%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
7%
Intel Arc A750 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 12th, 2017 |
Alchemist | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$289 | MSRP | $199 |
1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
256-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
512 GB/s | Bandwidth | 96 GB/s |
2050 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
2400 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
2000 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |