Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 3050 outperforms Arc A380 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 3050 is 161 days older than Arc A380.
Advantages of Intel Arc A380
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 - 75 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050
- Performs up to 21% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Arc A380 - 117 vs 97 FPS
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than Intel Arc A380 - 8 vs 6 GB
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
117
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.96/FPS
100%
Price, €
€124.15
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €124.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 138 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 14th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 14th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
65.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
131.2 GTexel/s
92.26441631504923%
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
86.67682926829269%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Arc A380 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 |
---|---|---|
Jun 14th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 30 |
$149 | MSRP | $249 |
1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
96-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
186 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
2000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1552 MHz |
2050 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1777 MHz |
1937 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |