Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Arc A380 outperforms the more expensive GeForce GTX 1050 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Arc A380 is 2058 days newer than the more expensive GeForce GTX 1050.
Advantages of Intel Arc A380
- Performs up to 6% better in War Thunder than GeForce GTX 1050 - 226 vs 214 FPS
- Up to 33% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1050 - $73.11 vs $108.91
- Up to 36% better value when playing War Thunder than GeForce GTX 1050 - $0.36 vs $0.56 per FPS
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 - 6 vs 2 GB
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jun 14th, 2022
FPS
226
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€81.15
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €81.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
Buy for €120.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 62 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jun 14th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
46.56 GPixel/s
70%
Texel Fillrate
58.2 GTexel/s
44%
Intel Arc A380 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 |
---|---|---|
Jun 14th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 10 |
$149 | MSRP | $109 |
1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
96-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
186 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s |
2000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1354 MHz |
2050 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1455 MHz |
1937 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1752 MHz |