Key Differences
In short — Arc A380 outperforms GeForce GT 520 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Arc A380 is 4080 days newer than GeForce GT 520.
Advantages of Intel Arc A380
- Performs up to 1100% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than GeForce GT 520 - 36 vs 3 FPS
- Up to 500% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 - 6 vs 1 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 520
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Arc A380 - 29 vs 75 Watts
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Arc A380
Desktop • Jun 14th, 2022
GeForce GT 520
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2011
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GT 520
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2011
Pixel Fillrate
1.62 GPixel/s
2.469512195121952%
Texel Fillrate
6.48 GTexel/s
4.939024390243904%
Intel Arc A380 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GT 520 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 14th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 13th, 2011 |
| Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 500 |
| $149 | MSRP | $59 |
| 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | DDR3 |
| 96-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
186 GB/s | Bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s |
2000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 810 MHz |
| 2050 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1937 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
