Key Differences
In short — Arc A350M outperforms Radeon R9 280 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Arc A350M is 2948 days newer than Radeon R9 280.
Advantages of Intel Arc A350M
- Performs up to 12% better in F1 22 than Radeon R9 280 - 65 vs 58 FPS
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 25 vs 200 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 280 - 4 vs 3 GB
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Arc A350M
Mobile • Mar 30th, 2022
Radeon R9 280
Desktop • Mar 4th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Intel Arc A350M | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280 |
|---|---|---|
Mar 30th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 4th, 2014 |
| Alchemist | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $279 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 2x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
| 112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 240 GB/s |
1150 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 827 MHz |
2200 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 933 MHz |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
