Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB outperforms the cheaper Arc A310 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Arc A310 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB is 2246 days older than the cheaper Arc A310.
Advantages of Intel Arc A310
- Up to 31% cheaper than GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB - $73.11 vs $106.02
- Up to 28% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB - $1.27 vs $1.76 per FPS
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB - 30 vs 120 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB - 4 vs 3 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
- Performs up to 5% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Arc A310 - 67 vs 64 FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €81.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 122 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 18th, 2016
FPS
67
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.76/FPS
72%
Price, €
€117.68
68%
FPS Winner
Buy for €117.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Desktop • Aug 18th, 2016
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Aug 18th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
81.98 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
123 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Arc A310 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 18th, 2016 |
Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Not Available | MSRP | $199 |
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 192-bit |
124 GB/s | Bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s |
1750 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1506 MHz |
1750 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1708 MHz |
1937 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2002 MHz |