Key Differences
In short — Arc A310 outperforms GeForce 210 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Arc A310 is 4748 days newer than GeForce 210.
Advantages of Intel Arc A310
- Performs up to 42% better in Elden Ring than GeForce 210 - 47 vs 33 FPS
- Consumes up to 3% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce 210 - 30 vs 31 Watts
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce 210 - 4 vs 0 GB
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for €55.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2009
Pixel Fillrate
2.08 GPixel/s
7.428571428571429%
Texel Fillrate
4.16 GTexel/s
7.428571428571429%
Intel Arc A310 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce 210 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2009 |
Alchemist | Generation | GeForce 200 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0 | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x VGA |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 0.5 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | DDR3 |
64-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
124 GB/s | Bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s |
1750 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 520 MHz |
1750 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1937 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 400 MHz |