The HD Graphics 615 is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 2100. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the HD Graphics 615
- Consumes up to 86% less energy – 5 vs 35 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 2100
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
HD Graphics 615 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
HD Graphics 615
Aug 30th, 2016
Average FPS
40
89%
Min 1% FPS
15
83%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Jun 4th, 2017
Average FPS
45
100%
Min 1% FPS
18
100%
Price, €
€67.56
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.5/FPS
100%
HD Graphics 615 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The HD Graphics 615 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The HD Graphics 615 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 in core GPU performance specifications
HD Graphics 615
Aug 30th, 2016
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
2.55 GPixel/s
13%
Texture Fillrate
20.4 GTexel/s
52%
FP32
326.4 GFLOPS
26%
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Jun 4th, 2017
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
48 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
1.248 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
HD Graphics 615 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Aug 30th, 2016 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
Not Available | MSRP | $149.00 |
HD Graphics-M | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
5 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
Memory | ||
System-Shared | Memory Size | 2 GB |
System-Shared | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
System-Shared | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
2.55 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 19.5 GPixel/s |
20.4 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 39.01 GTexel/s |
326.4 GFLOPS | FP32 | 1.248 TFLOPS |