Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is 993 days newer than GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q.
Advantages of GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
- Performs up to 179% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q - 173 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q - 16 vs 4 GB
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
- Consumes up to 75% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile - 30 vs 120 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2023
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Theoretical Performance
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
Mobile • Jan 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
515.3 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Mobile • Apr 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
36 GPixel/s
19%
Texel Fillrate
72 GTexel/s
14%
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | vs | GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q |
|---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 15th, 2020 |
| GeForce 40 Mobile | Generation | GeForce 16 Mobile |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | None |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
16 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
576 GB/s | Bandwidth | 160 GB/s |
1335 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 930 MHz |
1695 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1125 MHz |
2250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |
