The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a much slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 4090 D. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
- Consumes up to 33% less energy – 285 vs 425 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 4090 D
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 24 vs 12 GB
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs GeForce RTX 4090 D for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Jan 3rd, 2023
Average FPS
175
81%
Min 1% FPS
109
77%
Price, €
€937.09
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.35/FPS
100%
GeForce RTX 4090 D
Dec 28th, 2023
Average FPS
217
100%
Min 1% FPS
141
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs GeForce RTX 4090 D in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs GeForce RTX 4090 D in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti vs GeForce RTX 4090 D in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
Jan 3rd, 2023
Memory
12 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
504.2 GB/s
50%
Pixel Fillrate
208.8 GPixel/s
47%
Texture Fillrate
626.4 GTexel/s
55%
FP32
40.09 TFLOPS
55%
GeForce RTX 4090 D
Dec 28th, 2023
Memory
24 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
1010 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
1149 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
73.54 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 4090 D |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Dec 28th, 2023 |
$799.00 | MSRP | $1,599.00 |
GeForce 40 | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
285 W | Power Consumption | 425 W |
Memory | ||
12 GB | Memory Size | 24 GB |
GDDR6X | Memory Type | GDDR6X |
192-bit | Memory Bus | 384-bit |
504.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 1010 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
208.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 443.5 GPixel/s |
626.4 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 1149 GTexel/s |
40.09 TFLOPS | FP32 | 73.54 TFLOPS |