The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is the same performance gaming GPU as the Arc A750. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
- Consumes up to 49% less energy – 115 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the Arc A750
The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile is better in every way
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs Arc A750 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
Jan 3rd, 2023
Average FPS
122
100%
Min 1% FPS
71
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
122
100%
Min 1% FPS
71
100%
Price, €
€245.39
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.01/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€245.39
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€162.15
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€296.92
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€251.35
In Stock
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs Arc A750 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs Arc A750 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile vs Arc A750 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
Jan 3rd, 2023
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
50%
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
30%
Texture Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
45%
FP32
15.62 TFLOPS
91%
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
268.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
537.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
17.2 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $289.00 |
| GeForce 40 Mobile | Generation | Alchemist |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
115 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 256 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 81.36 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 268.8 GPixel/s |
| 244.1 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 537.6 GTexel/s |
| 15.62 TFLOPS | FP32 | 17.2 TFLOPS |
