The GeForce RTX 2070 is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 960 and it's also a better value for money, as it's only $373.86 more expensive!
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 2070
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A better value for money for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 960
- Up to 62% cheaper – $229.73 vs $603.59
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 120 vs 175 Watts
GeForce RTX 2070 vs GeForce GTX 960 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce RTX 2070
Oct 17th, 2018
Average FPS
101
100%
Min 1% FPS
57
100%
Price, €
€603.59
38%
Value, €/FPS
€5.97/FPS
70%
Buy on Amazon
€603.59
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€611.71
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€608.11
In Stock
GeForce GTX 960
Jan 22nd, 2015
Average FPS
55
54%
Min 1% FPS
25
44%
Price, €
€229.73
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.17/FPS
100%
GeForce RTX 2070 vs GeForce GTX 960 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce RTX 2070 vs GeForce GTX 960 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce RTX 2070 vs GeForce GTX 960 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce RTX 2070
Oct 17th, 2018
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
103.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
233.3 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
7.465 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 960
Jan 22nd, 2015
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
112.2 GB/s
25%
Pixel Fillrate
37.7 GPixel/s
36%
Texture Fillrate
75.39 GTexel/s
32%
FP32
2.413 TFLOPS
32%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce RTX 2070 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 960 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Oct 17th, 2018 | Release Date | Jan 22nd, 2015 |
$499.00 | MSRP | $199.00 |
GeForce 20 | Generation | GeForce 900 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
175 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
256-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
448 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112.2 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
103.7 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 37.7 GPixel/s |
233.3 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 75.39 GTexel/s |
7.465 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.413 TFLOPS |