The GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q is a slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6650M. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
- Consumes up to 25% less energy – 90 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6650M
- A faster GPU for gaming
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs Radeon RX 6650M for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Jan 29th, 2019
Average FPS
87
91%
Min 1% FPS
47
89%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Radeon RX 6650M
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
96
100%
Min 1% FPS
53
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs Radeon RX 6650M in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs Radeon RX 6650M in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs Radeon RX 6650M in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Jan 29th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
75.84 GPixel/s
49%
Texture Fillrate
170.6 GTexel/s
63%
FP32
5.46 TFLOPS
63%
Radeon RX 6650M
Jan 4th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
58%
Pixel Fillrate
154.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
270.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
8.659 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6650M |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 29th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| GeForce 20 Mobile | Generation | Navi Mobile |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
90 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
384 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 75.84 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 154.6 GPixel/s |
| 170.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 270.6 GTexel/s |
| 5.46 TFLOPS | FP32 | 8.659 TFLOPS |
