The GeForce MX350 is a much slower gaming GPU than the Radeon 680M. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce MX350
- Consumes up to 60% less energy – 20 vs 50 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon 680M
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
GeForce MX350 vs Radeon 680M for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce MX350
Feb 10th, 2020
Average FPS
47
85%
Min 1% FPS
20
80%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon 680M
Jan 3rd, 2023
Average FPS
55
100%
Min 1% FPS
25
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce MX350 vs Radeon 680M in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce MX350 vs Radeon 680M in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce MX350 vs Radeon 680M in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce MX350
Feb 10th, 2020
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
56.06 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
14.99 GPixel/s
21%
Texture Fillrate
29.98 GTexel/s
28%
FP32
1.199 TFLOPS
35%
Radeon 680M
Jan 3rd, 2023
Memory
0 GB
0%
Memory Bandwidth
0 GB/s
0%
Pixel Fillrate
70.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
105.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
3.379 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce MX350 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon 680M |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Feb 10th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2023 |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
GeForce MX | Generation | Navi II IGP |
Laptop | Segment | Integrated |
20 W | Power Consumption | 50 W |
Memory | ||
2 GB | Memory Size | System-Shared |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | System-Shared |
64-bit | Memory Bus | System-Shared |
56.06 GB/s | Bandwidth | System-Shared |
Theoretical Performance | ||
14.99 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 70.4 GPixel/s |
29.98 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 105.6 GTexel/s |
1.199 TFLOPS | FP32 | 3.379 TFLOPS |