The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Arc A750 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $654.33 more expensive!
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 980 Ti
The Arc A750 is better in every way
Advantages of the Arc A750
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 73% cheaper – $244.77 vs $899.10
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 10% less energy – 225 vs 250 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 6 GB
GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Arc A750 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Jun 2nd, 2015
Average FPS
80
66%
Min 1% FPS
42
59%
Price, €
€899.1
27%
Value, €/FPS
€11.23/FPS
18%
Buy on Amazon
€244.77
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€252.33
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€264.82
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€251.35
In Stock
GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Arc A750 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Arc A750 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Arc A750 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Jun 2nd, 2015
Memory
6 GB
75%
Memory Bandwidth
336.6 GB/s
66%
Pixel Fillrate
103.3 GPixel/s
38%
Texture Fillrate
189.4 GTexel/s
35%
FP32
6.06 TFLOPS
35%
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
268.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
537.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
17.2 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 980 Ti | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc A750 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
$649.00 | MSRP | $289.00 |
GeForce 900 | Generation | Alchemist |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
250 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
Memory | ||
6 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
384-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
336.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
Theoretical Performance | ||
103.3 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 268.8 GPixel/s |
189.4 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 537.6 GTexel/s |
6.06 TFLOPS | FP32 | 17.2 TFLOPS |