The GeForce GTX 970M is a much slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro W6400. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 970M
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 4 GB
Advantages of the Radeon Pro W6400
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
GeForce GTX 970M vs Radeon Pro W6400 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 970M
Oct 7th, 2014
Average FPS
55
86%
Min 1% FPS
25
78%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon Pro W6400
Jan 19th, 2022
Average FPS
64
100%
Min 1% FPS
32
100%
Price, €
€180.17
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.81/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 970M vs Radeon Pro W6400 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 970M vs Radeon Pro W6400 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 970M vs Radeon Pro W6400 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 970M
Oct 7th, 2014
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
120.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
49.82 GPixel/s
67%
Texture Fillrate
83.04 GTexel/s
74%
FP32
2.657 TFLOPS
74%
Radeon Pro W6400
Jan 19th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
67%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
93%
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
3.58 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 970M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro W6400 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 7th, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| GeForce 900M | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Not Available | Power Consumption | 50 W |
| Memory | ||
6 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 192-bit | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
120.3 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 49.82 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 74.59 GPixel/s |
| 83.04 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 111.9 GTexel/s |
| 2.657 TFLOPS | FP32 | 3.58 TFLOPS |
