The GeForce GTX 960 is the comparison's loser – it's a much slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 590 GME and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $121.63 more expensive!
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 960
- Consumes up to 31% less energy – 120 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 590 GME
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 53% cheaper – $108.10 vs $229.73
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
GeForce GTX 960 vs Radeon RX 590 GME for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 960
Jan 22nd, 2015
Average FPS
55
79%
Min 1% FPS
25
71%
Price, €
€229.73
47%
Value, €/FPS
€4.17/FPS
37%
Radeon RX 590 GME
Mar 9th, 2020
Average FPS
70
100%
Min 1% FPS
35
100%
Price, €
€108.1
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.54/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 960 vs Radeon RX 590 GME in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 960 vs Radeon RX 590 GME in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 960 vs Radeon RX 590 GME in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 960
Jan 22nd, 2015
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
112.2 GB/s
44%
Pixel Fillrate
37.7 GPixel/s
83%
Texture Fillrate
75.39 GTexel/s
37%
FP32
2.413 TFLOPS
37%
Radeon RX 590 GME
Mar 9th, 2020
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
45.44 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
204.5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
6.543 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 960 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 22nd, 2015 | Release Date | Mar 9th, 2020 |
| $199.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
| GeForce 900 | Generation | Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
120 W | Power Consumption | 175 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 112.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 37.7 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 45.44 GPixel/s |
| 75.39 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 204.5 GTexel/s |
| 2.413 TFLOPS | FP32 | 6.543 TFLOPS |
