The GeForce GTX 960 is the comparison's loser – it's a much slower gaming GPU than the Radeon Pro WX 7100 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $74.79 more expensive!
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 960
- Consumes up to 8% less energy – 120 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon Pro WX 7100
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 33% cheaper – $154.94 vs $229.73
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
GeForce GTX 960 vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 960
Jan 22nd, 2015
Average FPS
55
83%
Min 1% FPS
25
78%
Price, €
€229.73
67%
Value, €/FPS
€4.17/FPS
56%
Radeon Pro WX 7100
Nov 10th, 2016
Average FPS
66
100%
Min 1% FPS
32
100%
Price, €
€154.94
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.34/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 960 vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 960 vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 960 vs Radeon Pro WX 7100 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 960
Jan 22nd, 2015
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
112.2 GB/s
50%
Pixel Fillrate
37.7 GPixel/s
95%
Texture Fillrate
75.39 GTexel/s
42%
FP32
2.413 TFLOPS
42%
Radeon Pro WX 7100
Nov 10th, 2016
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
39.78 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
179 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.728 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 960 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon Pro WX 7100 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 22nd, 2015 | Release Date | Nov 10th, 2016 |
$199.00 | MSRP | $799.00 |
| GeForce 900 | Generation | Radeon Pro Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
120 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Memory | ||
| 2 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 112.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 37.7 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 39.78 GPixel/s |
| 75.39 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 179 GTexel/s |
| 2.413 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.728 TFLOPS |
